King Charles honors aristocrat at center of William cheating rumors
The above headline is from the Mercury News and a story written by MARTHA ROSS | Bay Area News Group
I have been to the UK many, many times, even long before I became enmeshed in the travel industry. We so enjoyed our visit that our next 4 trips across the Atlantic, often referred to as “The Pond,” were back to the UK so that we could explore every corner of England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and a big chunk of Wales. While the UK government and the UK tourism folks like to think that the “royal” family are a big tourism draw, none of my trips were planned with any expectation of interfacing with the “royals.” In fact, one had to hope that they weren’t in residence at Buckingham or Balmoral or Windsor Castle because, if they were in residence, visitors were not permitted.
I have been interested in the scandalous behavior of the pampered, over-indulged set whose actions are, generally, deplorable and I’ve followed details that are publically available and those expressed to me by people who live in the UK and Ireland who are closer to the scene. The details related to so many elements of the events and clashes presented by UK broadcasters and those US royal-watchers are, in general, present opinions designed to make sure they stay on the “A-List” for invitation tno parties, charitable events and official pagentry so their comments are designed more to keep the reporter in good favor than to deal in anything that looks like truth. I have a lot to share with you that needs to be woven together in some logical order because most of what is swimming around in the media related to royal trash is a bunch of threads blowin’ in the wind with no logical input. But this latest “Where’s Waldo” serious concern about Kate Middleton’s health and safety has more facets than a 50 carat diamond.
Let me leave you with these thoughts: Why are all the journalists in print, online and broadcasters on radio and TV taking at face value that: (1) Kate doctored a photo image taken by William. Was there EVER REALLY a photo to begin with or was it a collage of images pasted together from the outset. And who pasted them together? Could it have been William or someone other than Kate just to prove she is alive and well? (2) Kate and William’s youngest child is the “acting-out” imp. George, as the oldest child, even if were not destined to be king if the monarchy of the UK & Commonwealth is still a “thing” when he is an adult, is destined to be a high achiever. Eldest children always are. The middle child is a girl, Charlotte. She is a typical middle child, the one who is the peacemaker and compromiser. Because she is a girl, she stands out as more mature and is well-poised. Like Prince Harry as a child, Louis seems to know he’s the “baby” and pushes limits. He’s the one who will act-up and act-out and it’s expected by one and all. He’s the one who will stick his tongue out just to be “cute.” And he doesn’t seem to be concerned about how he is perceived. That being said, I think he is trying to send a message to anyone clever enough to understand what’s on his mind, in the Mothers’ Day photo that has caused the sensation of the moment. So here’s my question about that message: Were you taught that it’s wrong to lie. . .even a little fib. . .but that if you were lying, you could absolve yourself of any guilt associated with lying if you crossed your fingers when you told the lie? Maybe you’d put the hand(s) with the crossed fingers behind you back so no one noticed that you were lying.. . .Well, look at that montage family photo with all of the photoshop errors that was published to prove that Kate is alive and well and enjoying Mothers’ Day and look at Louis, the little boy on the left and look at his hand with the crossed fingers. I believe that Louis is clever enough to know that he was participating in a scam and wanted to be absolved for the whole scenario! Could the three children have been photographed surrounding an empty chair into which Kate was later dropped through digital means and Louis just couldn’t deal with the secret?
(3) Why would anyone, including all of the UK and US press, assume that the text posted online attributed to “C” apologizing for the botched, edited photo was actually written and posted by Catherine/Kate? Anyone with access to her password/account could have written and posted that apology. In Kate’s case, the Firm’s PR machine has access and capability to write and post whatever they like an sign it as they like. (4) A photo that is supposed to be Kate wearing sunglasses in a car driven by her mother was posted a day or 2 ago. It is one of those rare very sunny days in England. The sun’s rays are angled right into Kate’s mom’s face. . .and she’s the driver. . .but she has no sunglasses on. Kate, if that’s even her as the face is a bit puffy/distorted, is in deep shade. . .no sun on her face. So why is she the one with the sunglasses? (5) The Firm interceded as a wedge between the photo of Kate and her mom in the car and media publishers in the UK. So while we have seen this photo in the US and it has been shown in other parts of the world, it has not been seen in the UK due to the monarchy’s intervention. This is just one of those indicators of what Harry was trying to say about the monarchy in the UK interceding to protect family members. Harry’s comment was that the monarchy told the press to not publish negative stories that were TRUE to protect family members but they wouldn’t ask the press to stop publishing horrid and untrue stories about Meghan. He was referring, without specifics, to the stories about William getting caught philandering. There facts were out there and you’re hearing references to his (I must say alleged because I wasn’t in the next bed!) affair with Rose Hanbury. . . which is a bigger and juicier story that I will be happy to share with you at sabrams.net before next weekend! So Harry was ticked-off because stories about Prince Albert’s visits with Jeffrey Epstein and Prince William philandering about when Kate was pregnant with their third child were squashed by the monarchy but no one would step in to stop the “Straight Outta Compton” headlines trashing Meghan in the British press. Harry’s point was that the monarchy squashes stories that are true to protect family members but wouldn’t squash untrue stories about Meghan. Seems easy to hold a grudge and hold accountable those who are supposed to “love” you but won’t lift a finger to right an injustice! (6) Oh, you Dumb Bunnies! So the royal nitwits put out yet-another photo to show that Kate is in good form and dashing about. This photo, put out a day or 2 ago, shows what appears to be Kate looking out of the left window of the car from the back seat so you only see the back of her head and a sliver of her right cheek and William is sitting beside her completely engaged in his cell phone. The are driving next to a brick wall. The bricks are jelly-apple red and so is the mortar between the bricks. They appear to be antique bricks, bricks “of a certain age,” as they say of older women, and you can see through the window on Kate’s side of the car, the continuation of that brick wall. Except the bricks seen through that window are more modern, have concrete-colored mortar and some of the bricks are black! That little spot of bricks seen through the window are not part of that wall unless there used to be a door or window in that wall that someone bricked up with very different bricks. Since the building is supposed to be Sandringham, I doubt that that photo is an accurate depiction of a wall on that building. (7) Remember that I am an author who see fictionalized story in every ounce of truth. So, based on that, what if the length of Kate’s convalescence is proportionate to her anger with William due to his potential continuation of philandering about? If I were fictionalizing this story, I’d suggest that when she went into the hospital for some legitimate abdominal something-or-other procedure, they discovered that she had an advanced stage of some god-awful sexually transmitted disease which was a special gift from her husband’s mistress. Worth thinking about. One can’t leave out the idea that the extended recovery period may be more related to getting her mental health in order than her physical condition. (8) Here’s what you need to know about Rose Hanbury: Rose was a schoolmate of Kate and they were on a friendly basis until it became clear that Rose and William were, over a five month period having a fling. The period coincided with Kate getting closer to delivering Louis, their Wales’ third child. During that period, William was going out, alone, to parties and events, including wedding reception(s) and getting sloshed. At one of those event when Kate was very close to her due date, William reportedly got drunk. Depending on whom you wish to believe, he either got into a fight or he tripped and fell, but, either way, he chipped a front tooth on a table as he hit the floor. It was the middle of the night, something like 3am, and his security guards scooped him up and contacted “the royal dentist” who called his dental assitant and went to open his office in the middle of the night to repair William’s tooth. William is reported to have said that he was concerned about getting the tooth repaired at once because Kate was on the verge of giving birth and how could he appear at the hospital and get caught smiling with a broken front tooth? How would that look/be explained?? I’d love the have that dentist as my dentist as he did a fabulous job! William arrived home at 8am having missed a night in his own bed. Kate was miffed and more emerged about his recent escapades. Kate insisted that Rose Hanbury and her husband should not ever be included on any royal invitation lists as she does not want her to be in her presence again. William, apparently agreed. The Hanburys, however, were not amused. Rose is at least a decade or more younger than her husband, has been photographed at official events without her wedding ring, and rarely looks happy. But Rose didn’t like being snubbed and, it is gossiped, there was noise about the potential of Rose writing a ‘tell-all’ book that would have made Harry’s “Spare” look like a copy of “Peter Rabbit.” The Monarchy couldn’t have that. There are videos and photos of Kate snubbing Rose and events she managed to be at. So, over Kate’s wishes to exclude Rose and her husband from events at court, King Charles decided that ignoring the couple was not the best route to peace in the valley. The last thing he needed was more writing about scandalous behavior. There was enough truth out there that berated his second wife, often known in wider circles as The Rottweiler. Charles is a strong believer in the adage, “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.” Not bad advice, it appears. So Charles, who was ad hoc king after QEII has died but before his official coronation ceremonies, had a brainstorm. He contacted Rose’s husband, the Marquess of Cholmondeley (pronounced Chum-lee), whose name is David Rocksavage, and asked for a meeting. When they met, Charles offered David the job as Lord-in-Waiting which is a cushy job since it is mostlly ceremonial and will assure that David and Rose are included in events run by the monarchy. And to cement the relationship so that no retaliatory books are written and that no smut is spread about William, the Rocksavage’s son was invited to be one of the four boys who were to each hold a corner of the train on the ceremonial robe that Charles wore to his coronation as they walked down the aisle of the cathedral. These special honors, sweeping the Rocksavages into the inner circle of the royal family, along with a non-disclosure agreement, assured that one of the two people alleged to have been involved in the intimate affair of Prince William. Everybody comes out looking good except Katherine who now has her husband’s alleged mistress, whom she knows is his mistress, given a royal blessing to be at every event and in her face! Ya gotta luv these folks! (For people in the midwest and west, that was sarcasm).
